miranda v. Arizona
Background
This case was brought together becususe they have to discuss an issue of constitutionality of other cases. In other cases suspects or convicts have been brought in by the police or FBI for interrogation, but weren't given what their rights were, so they have no idea whats rights they have in these interrogations. For instance they didn't know they had the right to a council. So they were given no warning at all.
Constitutional Question
Do these cases of police interrogating suspects without giving them their rights violate their self-incrimination of the 5th Amendment?
Lasting Effect
This case was in favor of Miranda, so this established to Miranda Rights; where you have to be read your rights when you get arrested.
This case was brought together becususe they have to discuss an issue of constitutionality of other cases. In other cases suspects or convicts have been brought in by the police or FBI for interrogation, but weren't given what their rights were, so they have no idea whats rights they have in these interrogations. For instance they didn't know they had the right to a council. So they were given no warning at all.
Constitutional Question
Do these cases of police interrogating suspects without giving them their rights violate their self-incrimination of the 5th Amendment?
Lasting Effect
This case was in favor of Miranda, so this established to Miranda Rights; where you have to be read your rights when you get arrested.